Tuesday, 13 June 2017

A lie is still a lie by any other name.

A lie is still a lie by any other name.

What is a lie?
What methods are employed by those that lie?
What reasons can there be to use a lie? Why is it told?
Is this a decent and honourable way to live and treat others?

I feel it sensible to begin with an understanding of the terminology being used and try to find a common ground on which we can follow the argument at hand. This will hopefully give us a benchmark by which we can refer and a sense that openness and truth be the desired outcomes. After all, who of us likes being lied to?

A Lie/to lie.
According to the Collins Online dictionary:
Verb Word forms: lieslying or lied

1. (intransitive) to speak untruthfully with intent to mislead or deceive
2. (intransitive) to convey a false impression or practise deception  the camera does not lie
3. an untrue or deceptive statement deliberately used to mislead
4. something that is deliberately intended to deceive

According to the Oxford English Online dictionary:



·         1An intentionally false statement:
‘they hint rather than tell outright lies’
‘the whole thing is a pack of lies’
More example sentences
1.       1.1 Used with reference to a situation involving deception or founded on a mistaken impression:
‘all their married life she had been living a lie’

·         1Tell a lie or lies:
‘why had Ashenden lied about his visit to London?’
[with direct speech] ‘‘I am sixty-five,’ she lied’
More example sentences
1.       1.1lie one's way into/out of Get oneself into or out of a situation by lying:
‘you lied your way on to this voyage by implying you were an experienced crew’
More example sentences
1.2 (of a thing) present a false impression:
‘the camera cannot lie’

Personally I don’t feel many people would argue against the descriptions here. But for the purpose of this discussion/article I hope that we can at least agree on this terminology. In essence lies are most predominantly words, statements of which the underlying motive is to deceive others, allow them to conclude something other than what the truth actually is, and also to conceal activities conducted by or on behalf of people or entities that would benefit directly from misconceptions and misunderstandings of evidences of that truth.

This brings us nicely on to the topic of what methods are being employed by liars to hide the truth?
The list cannot be exhaustive for obvious reasons. That list goes on beyond the realm of most of our imaginations. So I’ll try and capture the most common and easily implemented that display lying is indeed being used every single day, before our very eyes. (And ears)

Types of lies.
Flat out false statements or testimony, Misdirection, Avoidance of questions, Half-truths, White lies, Deceit, Silence, Trickery and Magic, Threats, A raised voice, Fear,  Violence and Concealment. I suppose that if we were looking for real truth and were prepared to offer it we would actively avoid any and all of these listed types. For it is my belief that without openness, transparency and definitively unbiased representation we can never expect to arrive at the truth which would otherwise stand alone.

What reasons can there be to use a lie? Why is it told?
Now here I believe we arrive at the main concern for the problem with lying, having clearly determined that it does indeed exist as both concept and observable activity in our current world. What possible motives could there be for anyone to tell a falsehood to another?
I’ll compile a list for ease and speed. Most of us would be asleep before we reached the end if an exhaustive and detailed list be offered to clarify each one individually. Then we can hopefully move on to examples of lying and discuss what dangers and outcomes occurred as a result of many lies being told. Is that fair?

Reasons to tell a lie.
To gain acceptance, to feel important, to hide shameful activities, to pretend our actions are honourable. Then to discredit others, to find audience with those that we could manipulate, to move the blame, the responsibility for an activity and place it at the feet of innocent parties. What about to pervert the course justice and create a false image of trust and decency and loyalty, and to bring outcomes for others not in agreement to bear upon them. I know this seems cynical but what about ‘GREED’, what about hatred and what about for the ‘LOVE’ of MONEY?
So would it surprise anyone that I have a very long list of potential candidates for lies that have been told? Or that often those lies did not do the good that those issuing them had hoped but a far worse outcome.  Or that the lies told actually were issued with wilfulness to create a state where few people knew what the hell was going on at all?  I’m not talking about Father Christmas, (Santa Claus, St Nikolas) or the tooth fairy. I’m talking about big deceptions, huge whoppers and globally destructive activities that were and are based on lies, whole lies and nothing but the lie……. So help me god…

I’ll have to begin with the one that has bothered me the most. WAR. That war is helpful and that it can bring about peace and eventually lasting peace. It seems quite evident that from quite a long history of fact finding and evidence gathering that war does not create peace. It doesn’t even stop the bloodshed, because by definition it uses bloodshed to stop bloodshed. War begets war and violence begets more violence. Another lie associated with this is that terrorism can be defeated by using and deploying weapons, especially those of mass destruction. Numerous conflicts and two major world wars later we still see not less but more terrorism. And another lie on top of this, that the actions of our western governments is not in itself an act of terrorism but of war, despite that any dictionary you look inside will describe the act we use in this as terrorism indeed.

The war in Iraq was as we clearly know now, based on false evidence and concealed details of our security agencies. Lies and misinformation yet again. And reportedly almost half a million people have now died as a direct result of this action and many more millions displaced from their homes and livelihoods. An illegal military intervention based upon false data for reason other than the said goal, in which 179 of our British soldiers died. Tony Blair was directly responsible for this when it has been proven that he knew the weapons of mass destruction were extremely unlikely to exist. And to add insult to injury, the fact that after his despicable actions he was made a ‘Peace envoy’ to the middle east, beggars belief. Let me repeat this, peace envoy? Are you kidding?

That the United States of America needed to bail out their private banks to stop total economic collapse. A lie.

That the World Trade Centre towers were brought down from the skies after standing for more than four decades by office fires. Another obvious bare faced lie.
https://youtu.be/677i43QfYpQ Jane Stanley BBC reporter 23 minutes before collapse of WTC 7
https://youtu.be/nQrpLp-X0ws  Lee Ann McAdoo talks to Rudy Dent

That JFK the US president whilst in a moving vehicle was assassinated by one man with a dodgy rifle, from the window of a building is quite ridiculous. It is not only questionable as a theory but defies much documented evidence from the scene and reports of the day by eye witnesses.

https://youtu.be/QRwFBKwQDSM  Youtube documentary.

That Climate Change whilst proven to be real is not heavily impacted upon by the actions of the human race, a massive whopping deception.
https://youtu.be/Cq1oFhTINXE David Attenborough.
https://youtu.be/3QmkHr0W5Vk Stefan Molyneux and Freedomain Radio

That the earth is flat, a denial of huge proportions.
Modern Flat Earth Societies.
Views from Space.

That Britain having nuclear weapons deters others from invading and is a value for money security system, is one catastrophic misjudgement.

That we don’t currently have access to all the technology we need to supply power for life and security that doesn’t need to be provided by fossil fuels, quite sinister.
A 13 year old Boy creates a free energy devise.

That Fracking will cause no harm to the planet or our seriously depleted fresh water resources, and is a safe practice. Humungous trickery.

Documentary about Fracking.

MYTH #7: “Fracking has never contaminated drinking water.”

That we are alone in the cosmos as the only form of life, seriously limited as an argument.

That vaccinations are completely safe and do not cause illness and even death, and are the best way to stop disease. Seriously devoid of scientific guarantees, hence misleading and based upon corrupted data.

Measles Vaccines Kill More People than Measles, CDC Data Proves

Most of the U.S. public is unaware that a U.S. citizen, by law, cannot sue a pharmaceutical company for damages resulting from vaccines. Congress gave them total legal immunity in 1986, and that law was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011. There is a special “vaccine court” called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program that is funded through a tax on vaccines. If you are injured or killed by a vaccine, you must hire an attorney and fight tax-funded government attorneys to seek damages, as you cannot sue the drug manufacturers.
An Italian court has revealed a previously-classified 1,271-page document by the British drug company, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) that confirms many dangerous side effects of certain vaccine combinations. The document discloses several vaccine combinations that were known to cause sudden death, and also inadvertently uncovers the sordid truth about the nature of Big Pharma. They do not care about hurting people if it means they can make money. GSK knew about the potential dangers of these vaccines — which are given to children — and obscured the truth behind a stack of official safety reports.

Judges demand answers after children die in controversial cancer vaccine trial in India.

Why 223 Cases of Polio Still Matter
What Doctors say about the dangers of Vaccines.
The pro-Pharma mainstream media would like everyone to believe that doctors and “scientists” all agree that vaccines are safe and effective, and that dissenters are uneducated or uninformed parents.
Not true.  Doctors and scientists who dare to speak out against the status quo, putting their own careers in jeopardy for telling the other side of the story, are of course few, and clearly in the minority. But that does not mean they do not exist. It just means they are fewer in number, because they value truth and the health and well-being of the public more than financial connections to the pharmaceutical industry.
The Greater Good Movie documentary.
This Doctor Dale Brown left me speechless.

Inconvenient Fact: 
 The Autism Rate in Cuba is 1 in 60,000

That there is not enough food to go round is huge deception and murder.
What is famine?
A famine is a widespread scarcity of food,[1] caused by several factors including crop failure, population imbalance, or government policies. This phenomenon is usually accompanied or followed by regional malnutrition, starvation, epidemic, and increased mortality. Every inhabited continent in the world has experienced a period of famine throughout history. Some countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, continue to have extreme cases of famine. It remains to be the most affected area in the world. And due to climate change, the conditions only fluctuate more and more. Predicting the seasons, as well as when to expect rain to help plant more crops seems to be a challenge. Most programmes direct their aid, and most increased efforts towards this continent.[2]

Western countries have a far higher ratio of personal waste

Roughly one third of the food produced in the worldfor human consumption every year — approximately 1.3 billion tonnes — gets lost or wasted. Food losses and waste amounts to roughly US$ 680 billion in industrialized countries and US$ 310 billion in developing countries.

That paedophilia is illegal and results in the guilty being brought to justice. Huge misdirection.
https://youtu.be/LLb8CJT92As Jimmy Savile OBE.
Child sex abuse is so rife in Britain that there is not enough land in the country to build the number of prisons needed to house the perpetrators, the Deputy Children’s Commissioner for England has warned.
Sue Berelowitz, who is currently chairing the government’s inquiry into the problem said the public would be shocked by the sheer scale of the problem when she reports in November.

Well done to Joe Public for his efforts to expose this Lie and the cover ups.
Joe Public

That the Queen of England (Royal establishment) is not the richest person (controlling entity) on the planet.
£35+ Trillion in assets and estate.

So by now I think you are getting the feeling that there are stark differences between the official story and the real story. That lies and mis-directions are being used for reasons not of our safety but for other agendas. And they seem to be getting away with this largely unchallenged by the main part of society and certainly not by its media and journalists whom say they pride themselves on looking for the truth. They’ seem to be in bed with the very organisations that are part of the problem with lying and hidden agendas.
Is this a decent and honourable way to live and treat others?
I don’t believe that it is and I hope by now that you are forming your own conclusions about this.
It’s up to you, each and every one of you to go away and do your own research and apply it in whatever way you feel you can. Don’t simply take my word for it, I might not have a true grip of the facts. But I do hope that I have at least put doubts into your minds and helped you to discover the many layers of ‘truth’ that do indeed exist.
As Morpheus in the Matrix says, ‘just how deep does the rabbit hole go’?

Please be level headed in how you respond to what you learn henceforth.

Love n peace.

Peaceful Warrior.

Friday, 19 May 2017

Being of service to others

Being of service to others
(Is the way to true peace).

Recently I’ve been struggling, struggling to understand something of importance to the people of our nation, and the wider world. A lack of concern for the well-being of others seems to be all pervasive and dominating the news. I don’t mean that everyone is showing this selfishness and lack of concern in every aspect of their dealings, but in a way each one of us is connected to this attitude. And the powerful elements of the world, the governance and the establishment seem to be leading the way in neglect and I’ll go so far as to say abandonment of concern for others. From one day to the next it seems ridiculous that so many people are suffering on this planet, in degrading and abysmal circumstances when we are capable of doing so much better.

So how can this happen? How is it that with all the knowledge and history behind us to review our behaviour, we are still letting thousands of people die of starvation each and every day? How is it that we are still killing one another in the theatres of war, which never seem to be exhausted? And why is doing something good for others regarded as an act of treason and anti-social behaviour?

Does anyone remember a time when prosperity was meant for all, not just the corporation shareholders and company owners?

Recently it has become apparent that the leader of the Labour Party is being ridiculed for the idea that everyone should prosper in the pursuit of a decent life and one with dignity. They are saying that he wants us to go back to the 1970’s. Well wasn’t that a time when things were much more equal in Britain? The Green Party (since the 70’s) have also long been advocates of sharing the wealth of our combined activities, to bring a quality and value to the lives we all live. As too other socialist groups and projects that believe undeniably that the resources of the planet do not belong to specific groups of people or wealthy individuals. What they have been saying and trying to lead the mainstream of understanding towards is socialism. A belief, that we all deserve at least the very basic requirements of life as a human right, access to water, healthy food and safe shelter. In every civilization throughout history this was considered normal and each one of those groups, tribes and nations did just that for their citizens without seeing it as odd.
Then came empire builders of course who inevitably had to take those rights away from ‘others’, and exploit them. Wielding the sword they used fear in such a way as to exact outcomes that did not put the wellbeing of others at the forefront of their decisions. Doing this helped them to gain more power, wealth and control over the ‘others’. And today we see the revelation of this behaviour as a dominant attitude that it is acceptable for others to suffer and go without, “as long as we are ok”. Even if some of those people are people we say we love and want to protect from harm, our citizens. It’s really a kind of psychosis that we can act in this way and not feel the shame or guilt of treating others so appallingly. Not dissimilar to a psychopath actually and definitely sociopathic.

I wonder; do we/they see our/their actions as hypocritical?

Each time I listen to the news and see images of the state of the world today, I feel ashamed to be a human being. It’s not just other people, but the planet and every other species on the planet that are suffering. Apart from a handful of people who have little actual power to alter things, getting involved in actions against this awful behaviour, the majority carry on in denial that anything is wrong, or too afraid to act in defiance. Our complicity is in doing nothing, as much as in accepting the rules set by the corrupt lawmakers. We are collectively sharing in the decimation of a future for the people here and the environment. We are committing one of the worse crimes imaginable, defeatism. 

I remember a time when things were so much different to today. Ok we didn’t have all the trappings that we seem to have thought would bring us prosperity and happiness, but we did have more happiness. And in that time prosperity was effectively shared in a wider scenario with the majority.
I’m not talking about Halcyon days even. I’m talking about a time when people communicated with each other. Before the fear of talking to strangers became the law. Before community spirit was outlawed by the greedy profiteers who wanted nothing to be owned in common but kept for private use and ownership. We had been warned by the wise that capitalism was likely to promote selfishness and suffering. In fact that it was at the very heart of its operations. They said that the race to own everything would leave many people with little or nothing to show for a life on this planet.  These brave souls spoke of the oppression that would inflict the worst kind of atrocities upon each one of us. Don’t be fooled by the hype that they were speaking untruths. Karl Marx, George Orwell, Friedrich Engels to name but a few all indicated that a time would come when the exploitation of others would lead to serious upheaval. Chaos is inevitable if the wealthy have control over everything, for they will not share it and allow equality and freedom to be manifest.
And this no doubt is why I say that I am struggling. I find it inconceivable to allow others to suffer when there is so much to go around. The people who really make all the decisions have so much money and the power that this brings, they could not spend it in even a million lifetimes. And they continue to take, and squeeze the little left into ever more unusable pieces, whilst having abundance.

To say they don’t care is an understatement. They do indeed care. They care that they have more even if it means other people will eat dirt. The planet has continually given all the life sustaining amenities to people and animals, creatures and plant life for the entire existence we have had. And in pretty well one generation human beings have put our continued existence here in jeopardy. Those like me who are prepared to say this are ridiculed and reviled as crazy, as perpetrators of instability. 

But does that mean that what I am saying is actually wrong?

I am struggling to see how anyone would continue to support any of this. Why we as a nation have not made it definitively clear that we do not want a greed driven government at the helm of our decision making. Does anyone know why it is called, the ‘house of commons’? Is not the house of commons meant to be the seat of representation of the common people? When over 78% of the MP’s are millionaires does this not strike anyone as a tad odd? Some of them clearly are common people, but not very many. I don’t say that having money is wrong or that this excludes anyone from being 'common', but can they as land owners and landlords really make unbiased decisions about these matters? When the husband or wife of a certain MP happens to be a shareholder or executive of a company or corporation could this not lead to a potential conflict of interest? (I mean to say that could they not actively favour one company over another for example, or one outcome over another?)

I find it very sad that ordinary people are so confused and or disinterested, that these governors of our country are not acting with integrity, and making decisions that favour either them directly, or their friends and family. It seems to me that many people feel dis-empowered to act, to decide what course of action they could take to change things dramatically. Fear is a very strong motivator it is true, but do not people realise that by stealth the governments of the past have systematically allowed certain groups of people to become very powerful and influential, and the interests of ordinary people to be left behind?

To see the truth of what is happening, take stock of what is before you. Ask yourself who will benefit from the decisions being made by others supposedly on your behalf. Did any of the bankers who were involved in the crash of 2008 go to prison? Were any charged with committing crimes? Were they asked to pay back the money they made from this shady venture? (Bailed out by taxpayers money) Have they continued to profit after the event, if the figures suggest that the wealthiest people of this country doubled their wealth since 2010? (Link) Or why we continue to have a Monarchy controlling the country, sapping resources when we are supposed to be a democracy?

I can see clearly that the world we live in is not actually a free and open democracy as we are meant to believe. And if you have ever watched the film ‘V’ for Vendetta then we aren’t too far away from this with our current Prime Minister talking about a ‘one party state’. I urge each and every one of you reading this, please do your research. Do not accept what the propogandist media share with you on a daily basis as fact. It is far from a fact. Be open to the intuitions you have, let the spirit of curiosity bring you closer to the truth. Be not fooled by feckless men who seek to deceive. Be aware of the control they hold over you and be peacefully non-compliant to their tyranny. For only then can you truly be free.

I hope that like me you discover, of what is truth, what is sacred, what is worth living for and what is worth dying for. The answer to each is the same. Love, only LOVE….

And from this comes my dedication to live a life that represents a desire to serve others. In doing this I am learning that a greater sense of peace and fulfilment comes when working towards this goal. If I had known this in youth I would now be able to hold my head high without regret, for I have failed so many times to be the best I could be. But I have not given up, nor in to mediocrity. I am taking strength from the lessons learned and a chance to double my efforts. This is the way, the source of real happiness and contentment. Though I started this post with a realization of the enormity of the problems we face, I am not giving up. The power of LOVE is far stronger than that of fear of failure.

As Jimmy Hendrix once said, “when the power of love overcomes the love of power, then we will have peace”.
I truly believe in this sentiment. For in the service of others, comes the way to true peace.


Monday, 26 December 2016

Peace, the perfect gift.

Peace, the perfect gift.

To best understand the concept of real peace, ultimately world peace and how we could share and give it, I guess we ought to try to imagine what it might actually look like if it were possible to possess it.

So what is peace to you, just the absence of war?

What would world peace look and feel like?

Have you any ideas of how amazing peace would be and of what value it would be to the inhabitants of the earth. Would it be very much different to what we have so far experienced throughout history?

John Lennon and Yoko Ono amongst a whole range of people throughout history have tried to describe their ideal and what it would epitomise if it came to be. The song IMAGINE by the Lennon Ono’s is one of the most well-known advocates of this idea as is the long since created give peace a chance. To begin with they suggest that what we do is to imagine a world that is different to the one that we currently have. A world that is perhaps governed by concerns and objectives far from the way our world has been shaped up until this point. I shall share the lyric below, to serve as another timely reminder just what a vision of fairness and equality it offered us.


Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today... Aha-ah...

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion, too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace... You...

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world... You...

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one

It is my feeling that what was being said or implied here in the song was simply to reconsider all of the fundamentals that have been causing huge problems on our planet. Not criticising particularly but asking, do these ideologies and philosophies give human beings a chance to enjoy the peace that may come if we didn’t let them interfere? It may be fair to say that simply following traditional perspectives is not in itself helpful to bring about world peace. Or we would already have it wouldn’t we? Maybe more openness and a little more compassion and empathy is what we need to help us evolve past this point.

I personally believe that we have never actually given peace a real chance, not with any serious intention. I mean that we talk about peace and security in quite nefarious terminology, in ways that haven’t allowed abstinence from violence to take the lead. Other than peace activists and campaigners who beg for peace to get a chance, the authoritarian elements of our world keep a strangle hold over the methods we can employ to achieve world peace. It really doesn’t serve the benefactors of war to stop using fear and propaganda in the desire to sell and deploy, fire and profit from weapons. In this I’m speaking predominantly of the arms trade and weapons manufacturers. Then there are the companies and corporations that benefit from the reconstruction programs of the war zones, often notably the same corporations. There is absolutely no evidence that anyone who lived in a city, region, country or nation that was bombed by armed forces has ever found a lasting peace and sense of security as a result of that campaign of violence. Currently Syria and Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq the Yemen, come swiftly to mind. Then are the many attempts to justify acts of violence even those using weapons of mass destruction as a ‘necessary means of war’.

It is said by our mainstream media that when the western nations use these methods we are defending our values and civilization against terrorism. When the countries we invade respond or retaliate their actions are not seen as people fighting for their freedoms, but again, as acts of terrorism against us. Repeatedly the use of these words banded about by our propagandist media defy a logical argument if a dictionary would be consulted. Terrorism is best defined as the acts we employ, equally as such of any retaliation by those people responding to unlawful invasion. What seems evident to the careful eye of scrutiny is that a high level of bigotry and hypocrisy exist that will always favour us, the western world and our carefully constructed views. I find this appalling though that fabrication of truth is so heavily engaged in, to steer the general views towards a biased and perverted outcome. Namely the confusing of people from hearing and seeing the reality of the situations in front of them, and the attempts to hide the perpetrators of lies from the shame that these actions deserve.

One of the real obstacles to world peace is marked as a lack of desire on the part of human beings to seriously acknowledge our inter-connectedness. For us to realise that the negative actions that we enact upon others actually has a negative effect upon our own wellbeing is unlikely. Likewise that positive actions result in shared positive outcomes. Cause and effect are natural laws of the world in which we live. The wind blows and things move even if not in our part of the globe, tiny often imperceptible movements go unnoticed but are affecting the overall balance of life. In the matter of peace if we are not willing to consider the arguments of the other side we cannot ever hope to find solutions that incorporate the desires of all people.

Evidently this also brings us to the matter of equality. An understanding of whether human beings are born with equal rights to life, material resources and a fair share of democratic governance. I have seen no evidence that real democracy is in action in any part of the world. Human beings have partitioned off various bits of the planet, staking some claim, god given or otherwise and insist that this gives them ‘rights’ that others are not allowed to have. The use of this presumed superiority has given rise to most of the despicable crimes against other human beings and the other species alive on this planet too. Human beings don’t seem capable of accepting that we are indeed an integral part of the natural world and not in any way superior to it. Yes we have our consciousness, we have an awareness that seems evidently different to the other beings on the face of the planet and beneath the oceans, but no evidence exist to suggest that this in and of itself gives us the superior mandate to make all the decisions about the fate of others. This is an act of gross stupidity I believe, and we ought to quickly rectify this if we ever hope to find real peace.

Historically many ancients knew that to live in harmony with our environments the spaces where we chose to live, was a sustainable and beneficial way to coexist. This has also been littered by much abuse of course, I’m not na├»ve to this, however for millennium human beings lived with far more care and compassion to others. Those that respected nature, the animals and creatures they shared their particular part of the globe with, had the greatest sense of peace. Native American tribes hold many things sacred for example which stopped them abusing the natural world as we are becoming ever more aware of with actions like the Lakota tribes responses to DAPL and the insanity of pushing oil filled pipes through both sacred lands and beneath the sources for life, lakes and rivers.

Chief Seattle famous for his many observations of the interconnectedness notably said:

What a pity the majority of people on this planet do not respect these ideas as if they were worthy of greater consideration. Yes it can be seen from historical accounts that peace in even those days was rare, but it wasn’t the native Indians that found it incomprehensible to be respectful to others was it? The desire to conquer the lands of others, to take their resources at any cost by any means was not initiated by that creed they lived by. Sadly it seems to have been promulgated by the greed of the kind of mentality that went about enforcing with violence, the idea that one man is inherently better than another. This was pretty well the attitude of the British Empire and all others that came before. We had a King, a Queen, a religious ideology that made our god more important than others and therefore a licence to spread our views throughout the globe, irrelevant of what was there before. By violence and arrogance we shoved our rightfulness down everyone’s throats. And if they didn’t appreciate that, then we just obliterated them and recorded a history that made us seem victorious with god’s backing.

So can we see that violence and fear, not peace and love has shaped the world into what we have today?

The Indian statesman Gandhi once said:

Einstein also famously said:

Quotes from others who have made peace a priority:

And the lists could go on forever really. So many people know that a different world IS possible, a world where peace love and harmony are the rule not the exception. It’s just that currently they are not the ones governing it, simply doing it. Those governing it, those that occupy another attitude don’t want to give peace a chance. For to do so, would mean a total transformation to the status quo and the ridiculously unjust and unequal order that serves the greedy and not the needy.

This song and video below I hope will go some way to helping to continue the messages of Peace that so many people have wished for, have dreamed of over the past decades, centuries. It is my wish that the message is shared far and wide a hope for mankind, for ordinary people to receive the blessings that could come if we really did, ‘GIVE PEACE A CHANCE’.

Please, become informed, study peace like your life depends upon it. It does!

The buck stops with us, with me and with you and if we can’t see the dreams we share come to fruition we may never get off of this merry go round of hate fear and disaster.

A sobering thought, but doable…!!!


Peaceful Warrior.