Sharing and Caring
So
what is it about sharing that is so distasteful to the powers that
be?
We
live on a planet that has everything we would ever need to live
happily, except fairness. The earth provides and allows production of
enough food for every person alive to have a full stomach at night
when they go to bed. Enough air for each one of us to breath, and
enough water for us all to drink bathe and work with. But we somehow
don't all have these things at our disposal when it is needed, and
the reasons are far from simple as to why.
One
noticeable thing about this is that we seem to live in lots of places
where the water is not readily available. The Sudan for example,
deserts and other barren lands where people have oddly chosen to live
but where the basic resources aren't readily available. Water
shortages leads to poor crop harvests which in turn leads to hunger
and death all too often in those places.
So
why, children ask don't those people move here to where we normally
have plenty of water? This simplistic view is quite a reasonable
train of thought, but what they have not yet understood is that we
(our societies mental reasoning’s) are unwilling to share what we
see as our land, our country, our property with those that need some.
To a child it seems quite natural to share the things we have so that
everyone gets a bit. (You may argue that is not the case when they
grow up a little, and yet don't they learn their behaviour from us
the grown ups?)
How
can you explain to your children that all men women and children
aren't equal and don't all have the same rights to their fair share
of what we all get for free from 'Mother Earth'?
Don't
ask Sarah Palin. Please...
I
find myself at a loss to answer with any real understanding when you
look at it from their (children's)perspective. The youth of today, be
it that they are learning to be greedy and non-giving from somewhere,
are still our best hope of change for the rights of everyone, if we
would be saved from disaster and ruin.
Why
don't we listen with our ears and hearts open to them?
Every
government 'claims' to be working for fairness and equality, but with
each successive budget, initiative or strategy they get us farther
away from fairness and genuine peace and harmony. The idea seems to
be, it is completely right fair and just, for the rich to keep taking
more. (Which it has to be said, mathematically means everyone else
gets less) They say that our (societies) belief that the democratic
capitalist ideals are working is still true. The evidence is that
this is just not true at all.
Only the rich get richer, as the poor either get poorer or stay where
they are. I am not about to make decisions about what someone is
worth and how much they should charge for things, but I am asking
what motivation there is behind these things, these decisions and
strategies, that is displaying a genuinely working example of
improvement for all.
For
example, a football player falls on the pitch with a suspected heart
attack. He is carried to hospital and dealt with cared for and saved
by people who's wages are so minuscule in comparison to his, yet so
much more vital for life to be enjoyed. (especially for him) Do you
hear people like that saying how wrong it is that for him to have so
much the people that saved him have to have not only so much less,
but uncertainty about what they have, and that there should be more
money put into the system that can provide this type of care?
I
can't answer on their behalf of course, but we hardly ever see any
real altruism from that sector.
Same
as with the banks and financial institutions. Do we ever hear them
saying, 'yes you are all correct, we made some pretty devastating
errors in our policy and strategy, so we will put back into the pot
what we have taken out, to see if that might not just save it, or at
least help?'
Again
I won't answer even if I think I know what I see.
Yachts
are not a luxury anyway..... nor are the best seats at the opera.....
So
our governments will keep on taxing us to death, taking from one
hand or the other. They are like magicians, they let you believe you
know where the ball is under the cup, whilst riffling your pockets
and stealing your belongings. They will say we love you and that all
our decisions are for the good of all, even when the proof is that
only a select few ever get the rewards. This might be conjecture on
my part, but doesn't it have a ring of truth?
Now
I don't claim to have all the answers.
I
have no idea if anything I say will have any positive impact at all,
and yet I still believe that it needs saying so that we can all have
just one more, several more viewpoints to consider.
What
would I do differently?
Well
for a start off, I would make sure that whatever decision I made, it
was thoroughly discussed before hand, and that for democracy to be
seen to be at work, the larger proportion of the voters views be the
way forward.
Use
the example of poll tax back in the 80's for example.
2
in 10 said yes, the two got their wish.
War
with Iraq.
90%
of the polled people said no.
10%
got a war on Saddam that was based on bull shit lies, which is still
going on costing the other 90% also trillions of pounds. (Which money
alone could have staved of the need for job cuts losses and
unemployment)
So
believe what they tell you at your/our peril. When they can tell us
the TRUTH about a subject, a provable truth, then maybe that day will
be a grand awakening of the global consciousness. Until then we are
going to be spoon fed the poisoned morsels of scraps they leave out
for the dogs.
Sharing
is and will be the best way for true happiness to enter our lives. It
is our destiny to realise this, and we shall be rewarded hansomly
when we do finally realise it.
Step
up to the plate, take a swing and let the freedom of your unfettered
souls strike the ball of change, sending it into touch for a home
run...
Rant
over....for today...
May
you smile and feel the love I send out to you all.
Peaceful
Warrior.